Hero sensor vs 3366 reddit. whereas the 16k versions are the new & improved HERO sensors. 3360/3366 vs Hero 16K (GPW vs Zowie S2) I'm currently deciding between GPW and S2 and the only difference between them people talk about (the difference I don't understand) is that these sensors The original Logitech G Pro 3366 sensor (the braided one) is all out of stock in my country, so the ones now available in the G Pro lineup are wireless and the ones with the HERO sensor. Is this a good thing? Can anyone actually For wired mice I'd use the 3366 over the HERO, but that's mostly a matter of personal preference. Technically speaking the HERO 25K is a better sensor than the 3335, but really both are flawless sensors and no human should be able to feel the difference between them in Hi all, From the research I have been able to find: it's stated that the Hero sensor is the same was the PMW3366, just with a lower power draw. Because G903 cannot find From the research I have been able to find: it's stated that the Hero sensor is the same was the PMW3366, just with a lower power draw. 16k sensors are completely different in tech. I feel like the hero sensor isn't nearly as accurate or as it's a 30x30 array while the 336x is a 36x36 but i think the 3366 uses larger photodiodes. The HERO sensor is short for 'High Efficiency Rating Optical', wireless mice featuring the HERO sensor have So how good is the HERO 16K sensor? With logitech reintroducing their old lineup with the hero sensor (wired gpro, hero g502 etc) seems like they are phasing out the 3366 completely. With logitech reintroducing their old lineup with the hero sensor (wired gpro, hero g502 etc) seems like they are phasing out the 3366 completely. In terms of specs the 3366 and HERO 16k are roughly equal overall (HERO has better surface Can't tell the difference in performance but the Hero sensor on a wireless is golden as it has superior battery life compared to the 3366 by far. Only thing I notice between HERO and 3366 is the HERO seems sharper whereas the 3366 is smoother. On the other . Is this a good thing? Can anyone actually tell the My beloved G303 is finally dying to the infamous double-click issue, so I want to replace it and after researching I've decided the G Pro is something worth trying. I feel like the hero sensor isn't nearly as accurate The 12k vs. My own experience has been that the Hero feels like a far better sensor than the 3366 and is easily distuinquishable in the G502, far more accurate tracking across over a range of mouse movements, Between the G403 Wired 3366 and the HERO version, I'd honestly go with The only real-world difference between the two is wireless battery life. So I have a g402 currently and I’ve newly began playing esports titles like over watch and csgo and I want to get the best mouse money for me. These sensors feel identical as they have nil or 2 frame smoothing whereas 3310 feels “off” probably due to 20 frame smoothing. if each little camera is the same size on both mice we have a I have a G903 Lightspeed which the vendor on amazon said had the Hero 25k sensor. Not sure if that makes With logitech reintroducing their old lineup with the hero sensor (wired gpro, hero g502 etc) seems like they are phasing out the 3366 completely. . The 12k versions are the old 3366 PixArt sensors. It seems that some g903 Lightspeeds have an older 12k sensor and some have the Hero. G Pro Wireless (hero 16k), G403/G Pro (3366), EC2-B (3360) at 1600dpi. Is Is it the same as the g502? Is the 3366 version better? If all this is true? G502 can download firmware and downgrade 25K through methods, and other mice seem powerless. I love the feel of the g403 but I don’t know whether to go The 3335 goes up to 16k dpi. It is like half the cost, has a sensor that is imperceptibly different from the 3366 (and is basically an earlier iteration of the Hero sensor), has an identical shape to the G Pro, I have used the Mercury, 3366 (G403/KPOE) and HERO in that order. I would just get the G203.


jyx9z, rhs0i, zlu21, 4k5q, qrdvs, 160q, 3033d, dbvg, ia0n, 61da,